When I watched a short video (see a link at the end of this article) of Cory Booker’s speech during a Democrat presidential debate In Houston, TX, the first thing that came to my mind was Hitler’s rhetoric regarding his “ultimate solution” of the “Jewish question”.

Booker said: “If I am president of the United States, I will create an office in the White House to deal with the problem of white supremacy and hate crimes and we will make sure that systemic racism is dealt with in substantive plans.”

To its all non-specificity, it was an open threat directed at whites. For those familiar with history of national socialism, or Nazism, in pre-WWII Germany, Booker’s insinuation must have been obvious: a call for whites’ removal from their present dominant position that would likely be followed by their dispossession of the country and its wealth. He did not make it clear if rounding up selected whites and sending them to concentration camps was a possible scenario in those “substantive plans”, but there was nothing in what he said that would exclude such a possibility. And the audience of the debate cheered, which strongly suggested that his blatant anti-Caucasianism was very much within the mainstream of his party.

It would be easy to blame all the above on Booker’s racism, that he tried to cover-up with his ostensible anti-racism, but the root cause of the problem here is not racism but diversity. For Booker’s racial hostility towards whites would not have mattered at all if he was living in, say, Jamaica – a country that is about 99% black and has no diversity at all. It was diversity of today’s America that made Booker’s threat credible and grave. Without diversity, Booker would not be in a position to make his threat, and even if he somehow would then he most likely would not have guts to pronounce it.

It is worth noting that Booker’s attacks on whites and their dominant role in America under the guise of fighting “white supremacy” are not justified by his condition or by condition of his constituency (or by any other rational reason, in that matter). True, there was time in America when slavery was sanctioned by the law, but so it was in the rest of the world (and still is in some countries). Then, in 1800s, these were white Americans who freed black slaves. Of course, not even a word of appreciation for that from Booker and his supporters. It would be really surprising if those whites who fought for Blacks’ freedom and citizenship would still be committed to that cause if they knew that never ending threats and attacks from some of the freed and their progeny would ensue as a result.

Moreover, whites were indispensable for the creation and unsurpassed prosperity of this nation. Without whites, America would not be the site of the world’s strongest economy or the world’s freest society that the world has ever seen. Without Blacks, we would be a different nation, but it is doubtful if we would be poorer and less free than we are with them among us. Blacks are under-represented among graduates from our schools and universities but are – according to Booker’s own admission – over-represented among those under “criminal supervision”.

The American voters, vast majority of them white, did elect a Black president in 2008, despite his rather weak qualifications for the top executive job in America. That, apparently, wasn’t enough for Booker and his fans to notice that white Americans prevailingly are not racist, or to appreciate a gesture for racial reconciliation. Based on their (Booker and fans’) words and deeds, it seems fair to conclude that a desire for racial harmony and productive collaboration is not what they harbor in their hearts; it is an intent of hostile takeover of the country that we and our ancestors have created and made prosper, instead. Their charges of racism, discrimination, and similar ill-meaning tendencies, are likely a result of projection – they project on us the sinister intentions of their own. Thus we can guess who they really are by listening to what charges they level at us; they are who they accuse us of being of.

The anti-white sentiment of Booker and a tone-setting faction of his party are obvious, yet there are many whites who either don’t notice the plot or chose to ignore it. Those whites do celebrate diversity, as if dispossessing them and – perhaps – driving them to extinction were ends worth celebrating. Whites’ population in the U.S. is declining and more and more “Democratic” policies facilitate that decline. It looks a bit like if the Jews in 1930s Germany were cheering the progress that Hitler and his Nazi party made in their march for political power.

Unlike Jews in Nazi Germany, we, the American whites, can still prevent our defeat and possibly genocidal consequences of it, now. Delivering a decisive defeat to the party of Booker and his folk in 2020 would be the first victory in the struggle for the survival of the Republic and our share of ownership of it. If you are white and vote Democrat then you may be submitting your future self or children to the mercy of racial groups that are hostile to whites even before they got an upper hand. They, although a small minority, are so belligerent now, so imagine what they are capable of doing to us when they and their party complete the power grab. The history of Germany 1933 – 1945 shows that it could be really detrimental to your well-being and survival.

References: Cory Booker Vows to Create Office to Combat White Supremacy

September 15, 2019

~ The Author ~
Mr. Dwyer has been a continuing contributor to the Federal Observer. Mark Andrew Dwyer’s recent columns are posted at:
https://federalobserver.com/?s=mark+andrew+dwyer
Links to his other commentaries can be found here: http://www.oocities.org/readerswrite/List_date.htm