House approves Parents’ Bill of Rights to give Americans more say in their kids’ education

The Republican-led House voted to pass its Parents’ Bill of Rights on Friday with zero Democrat votes after Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called it ‘fascist.’ The controversial bill, which gives parents a stronger role in what’s taught in public schools, is not expected to be taken up by the Democratic-majority Senate.

Critics denounce the legislation saying it has led to book bans, restrictions aimed at transgender students and unhinged board meetings nationwide.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy said Republicans were ‘keeping our promise, our commitment to America, that parents will have a say in their kids’ education.’ The bill passed 213-208, with five Republicans – primarily members of the House Freedom Caucus – Reps. Matt Rosendale, Mont., Ken. Buck, Colo., Matt Gaetz, Fla., Andy Biggs, Ariz., and Mike Lawler, N.Y.

It would require schools to publish course studies and a list of books kept in libraries and affirm parents’ ability to meet with educators, speak at school board meetings and examine school budgets.

Biggs told he voted no on the bill because ‘it violates the principals of federalism and the federal government is already too involved in education issues.’

McCarthy slammed Democrats as an ‘extreme minority party’ for voting against the education bill.’

‘[Parents] now have a say in your kids’ education,’ he told reporters after the vote. ‘You get to know what the reading materials are.’

But Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said the ‘fascist’ bill would target LGBT youth and censor racial content.

‘When we talk about progressive values, I can say what my progressive value is, and that is freedom over fascism,’ she said on the House floor. The New York Democrat told Republicans to ‘keep the culture wars out of classrooms.’

‘Parents want schools focused on reading, writing and math, not woke politics,’ Rep. Mary Miller, R-Ill., said during an earlier debate.

Advocates for LGBTQ people said the proposal threatens LGBTQ students by potentially forcing them to come out to their families, which can sometimes lead to abuse or abandonment.

‘It’s part of a pattern of attempts we’re seeing where the right wing of the Republican Party is really trying to marginalize LGBTQ people,’ said David Stacy, the government affairs director for Human Rights Campaign, to the Associated Press.

Sen. Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York promised the bill would meet a ‘dead end’ in the Senate and called it ‘Orwellian to the core.’

The bill follows a core GOP promise from the midterm campaign to fight against ‘woke’ education trends like critical race theory and gender theory.

It would require parental consent before ‘changing a minor child’s gender markers, pronouns, or preferred name on any school form; or allowing a child to change the child’s sex-based accommodations, including locker rooms or bathrooms.’

It would amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to require schools to provide a list of books available in their children’s library and to post curriculum publicly.

It requires parental consent before medical exams at school, including ‘mental health or substance use disorder screenings.’

Parental rights have launched to the forefront of conservative politics since COVID school shutdowns. It was central to Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s successful campaign against Democrat Terry McAuliffe in 2021.

“We’ll fight against this legislation. We’ll fight against the banning of books, fight against the bullying of children from any community, and certainly from the LGBTQ+ community,” House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries said.

Written by Morgan Phillips for The Daily Mail ~ March 24, 2022

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *