Democrats on Capitol Hill (last) week unveiled a program to use taxpayer dollars to help bring Massachusetts-style gun control laws to the rest of the country.
Massachusetts lawmakers U.S. Sen. Edward Markey, along with U.S. Reps. Joe Kennedy III and Ayanna Pressley on Monday introduced their Making America Safe and Secure (MASS) Act. The move would use federal grants to incentivize states to adopt the same gun-licensing standards used by the Commonwealth, which are some of the most restrictive firearm laws in the nation.
“By creating stricter guardrails around firearm purchasing and enforcing stronger gun safety laws, the MASS Act actively curbs the public health crisis that is gun violence,” said Pressley, a Boston-area progressive who won her seat last year with the help of national gun control groups. “Here in Massachusetts, we regularly put forward bold, activist legislation and I am proud to join in partnership with my fellow Bay Staters to say enough is enough.”
Filed in the Senate as S.2014, the bill would establish a U.S. Justice Department grant program open to eligible states that adopt and maintain licensing standards for gun owners. The guidelines would include that gun owners maintain a license, issued by their local chief of police or sheriff, for the entire time they legally possess a firearm. Licensing would include a thorough background check that could include an in-person interview and character references. First-time applicants would have to show proof of firearms training and the agency would have the ability to deny, suspend or revoke a license if they deem the applicant unsuitable.
The MASS Act was introduced with the approval of national gun control organizations to include the Brady Campaign.
Only 14 states have some sort of licensing or pre-certification requirement for the purchase or possession of firearms. The laws themselves are often controversial.
The first state to adopt mandatory gun licensing, New York, did so under the Sullivan Act, a 1911 law that requires anyone desiring a firearm small enough to be concealed to obtain a license. Even a century later, the law has been subject to legal challenges from those who hold licenses can be elusive, with applicants often waiting years or denied outright. In New Jersey in 2015, the case of a woman killed in her front yard by her ex-boyfriend while she was still waiting for her application for a firearm permit to be granted made national headlines. Meanwhile, critics of North Carolina’s Pistol Purchase Permit argue the practice was adopted in that state in 1919 as part of Jim Crow laws to strip minorities of their Second Amendment rights.
The MASS Act had been referred to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary. Meanwhile, Kennedy and Pressley intended to introduce a House version in their chamber later this week.
Written by Chris Eger for GUNS ~ July 2, 2019
Somebody is going to have to explain this to me. So to exercise my 2nd Amendment right it is subject to state approval based upon personal references and the garden variety background checks, the purchase of a license to obtain a weapon, and then the maintenance of that license for the rest of my natural lifetime if I intend to go to my grave with that weapon, that right? And one for each weapon I take it?
Just curious, how much for the other rights? Is their a package discount for going to church or expressing political opinions? What party is it again that advocates this? I want to make sure I get it straight for the 2020 election. That’s REALLY creative! ~ Chris Kallfelz
Legislation attempts such as this are predicated on the fallacy that criminals… or those intent becoming a criminal through their future actions… will be deterred by yet another law. History has demonstrated that criminals don’t abide by the laws of society.
The deeper meaning behind such legislation is suspect, this is one step closer to a registration scheme… they are attempting to register the owners of firearms, plain and simple. ~ xsnipe